Interpol
21 March 2010



      Home | Search | Contact | Help 
 

Stolen Works of Art > Conferences and meetings
Minutes
5th International Symposium on Works of Art, Antiques and Cultural Property
Lyon, 29 - 31 October 2002

 

1. 

GENERAL SECRETARIAT PROGRESS REPORT

2.

CD-ROM AND OTHER TOOLS DEVELOPED BY THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT

3.

INTERPOL GLOBAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM 24/7

4.

ILLICIT TRAFFIC IN CULTURAL PROPERTY

5.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

6.

PROTECTION OF ARCHAELOGICAL OBJECTS

7.

SALE OF CULTURAL PROPERTY THROUGH THE INTERNET

8.

NON-POLICE ORGANIZATIONS

Appendix (Recommendations)


  1. Mr DE WITTE, Assistant Director for Europe, Regional & National Police Services, opened the Symposium and welcomed the participants. He stressed the importance of close co-operation between member countries and expressed the determination of the General Secretariat to contribute to a safer world.

  2. The delegates elected Mr Deklerck, of the Belgian Delegation, to chair the Symposium and unanimously adopted the agenda.

 

1. GENERAL SECRETARIAT PROGRESS REPORT

  1. Mr JOUANNY, General Secretariat, reported on the General Secretariat's activities since the 4th International Symposium on Works of Art, Antiques and Cultural Property, held in Lyon in 1999. He provided an overview on the direct queries by the member countries on the ASF Works of art database. 95% of the checks in 2002 were made by European countries, Austria and Germany being the most frequent users. The total number of checks has been decreasing. This can partly been explained by the existence of another and more user-friendly tool, the Interpol CD-ROM.

  2. The electronic forwarding of information to the General Secretariat is currently dealt with by a working group on formatted messages in the framework of Interpol's new telecommunication system I-24/7.

  3. Mr Jouanny elaborated on the recommendations of the Conference on the Illicit Traffic in Cultural Property stolen in America, held in Mexico City in 1999 and described the organization of a training course including law enforcement, customs, and cultural institutions scheduled to take place in Bogota, Colombia in November 2002. He also introduced Interpol's website under www.interpol.int and its section dedicated to works of art.

  4. Mr LABERGE, General Secretariat, presented statistical information on art thefts covering the last five years and collected from the member countries. He underlined the fact that a number of countries declared that they did not compile specific statistics on art theft, that they had no art thefts or simply did not reply at all.

 

2. CD-ROM AND OTHER TOOLS DEVELOPED BY THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT

  1. Mr KIND, General Secretariat, presented the tools developed and made a demonstration of the contents and the functionality of the CD-ROM. Due to its easy use and its powerful search facilities, the CD-ROM is an efficient means to share information with the art trade, with professional and cultural institutions and all law enforcement agencies which do not have access to the ASF database. In so far, it can be considered as one of the registers on stolen art publicly available as referred to in the UNIDROIT convention.

  2. Upon concerns expressed by the SAUDI ARABIAN DELEGATE on the risks of diffusing information outside law enforcement, he replied that this policy is in accordance with a valid General Assembly resolution and that experience continuously showed that a number of stolen cultural goods end up on the legal market. Moreover, countries that have adopted a very strict information policy do not achieve better clearance rates for art-related crimes.

  3. Following suggestions that the CD-ROM should be distributed free of charge, Mr KIND explained that payment was needed to cover the production costs and reminded the delegates that the CD-ROM was delivered free of charge to all Interpol National Central Bureaus and at a special rate for other law enforcement agencies. The GENERAL SECRETARIAT REPRESENTATIVE stated that, by the very nature of this tool, there were no reliable figures available on how many objects had been identified via this tool, but mentioned two cases where his unit was explicitly informed.

  4. The REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE ART LOSS REGISTER mentioned that his company issued a search certificate as a means to trace who has requested a query on a specific item.

 

3. INTERPOL GLOBAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM 24/7

  1. Mr POLIFKO, General Secretariat's I-24/7 team, introduced Interpol's new Internet based telecommunication system which, in addition, will enable access to various databases. It will present advantages in terms of speed and costs and meet high security standards. Currently, seven countries are testing the functionality, the roll-out to all the member countries is expected to be finalized throughout 2003.

 

4. ILLICIT TRAFFIC IN CULTURAL PROPERTY

  1. The ITALIAN DELEGATE described the role of the specialist unit of the Carabinieri for the protection of cultural heritage. In his country, clear evidence has been gathered of the involvement of organized crime and various links to drug trafficking, blackmail, and money laundering activities have been detected. One money laundering scheme was to artificially raise the value of objects during an auction, pay with dirty money and re-sell the objects at the higher prices.

  2. . Between 1970 and 2001, over 40,000 art thefts involving nearly 700,000 stolen objects were recorded in Italy, about 180,000 of which have been recovered. In various cases, objects stolen in Italy were transported to Switzerland and further transferred to other countries, in particular United Kingdom, United States of America and even Japan and Australia. Based on police experience, he considered the trafficking in cultural property second in terms of value after drug trafficking, but precise statistical information was not available.

  3. The AUSTRIAN DELEGATE informed on the new structure created under the Bundeskriminalamt (Federal Criminal Police Office) which now also includes the works of art unit. Art thefts slightly raised on a low level from 145 cases in 2000 to 155 cases in 2001. She presented a case study of the recovery in a Vienna museum of an ancient Buddha statue stolen in Nepal in February 2002 and currently waiting for return to its country of origin. Austria regularly carries out checks of online auctions, but with no spectacular results so far.

  4. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT congratulated the Austrian delegate for the most regular and most frequent use of the ASF database for remote checks.

  5. The CHINESE DELEGATE presented the structures and resources put in place to protect cultural property in his country. China is particularly suffering from illicit excavations of ancient tombs. It has been established that cultural property items often illegally leave the country with Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan as transit areas, the final destinations include i. a. the United Kingdom, the United States and France. He presented a case where a successful international co-operation resulted in March 2000 in the seizure by the United States Customs Service of an ancient marble wall panel sculpture stolen in 1994. He also stressed the need for appropriate training for police and customs officers.

  6. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MUSEUMS SECURITY NETWORK advised that the Cultural Heritage Watch, a China based non-governmental organization to fight illicit trafficking which was funded by the United States, the United Kingdom, and Netherlands, could be of assistance. He further stated that there were ongoing rumours that Chinese authorities play a role in the illegal export of cultural goods and he wondered if the maintenance of the death penalty is considered as a good basis for international co-operation.

  7. The CHINESE DELEGATE responded that capital punishment was still foreseen as a legal sanction in the country's penal code. He informed that a database for stolen cultural property was under construction and would provide better chances for the information exchange in the future.

  8. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FRENCH GENDARMERIE mentioned the increasing number of Chinese artifacts appearing on the French market and asked for clarification on export regulations. The CHINESE DELEGATE stated that export was prohibited for objects that fell under the protection law, e.g. ancient objects, but that it was legal for duplicates. He added that there were still different regulations in force for Hong Kong and Macao which have a long a free market tradition, and for the mainland.

  9. The CYPRIOT DELEGATE stated that his country has also been affected by the looting of its cultural heritage, in particular following the events of 1974 in the Northern part of the island where various thefts had been committed from churches and monasteries. A specialist unit to fight art related crime was set up in 1998. He encouraged other countries to take the necessary steps to be party of the relevant international conventions for the protection of cultural heritage.

  10. The FRENCH DELEGATE, as a police officer posted at the Ministry of Culture, underlined the close relationship between the said ministry, the curators of local authorities, the police and the gendarmerie. He presented the prevention policy adopted, including inventories, measures of conservation and protection, and security systems which aimed at accumulating obstacles in order to delay the offenders and increase the opportunities for intervention illustrated by some examples.

  11. THE HEAD OF THE FRENCH CENTRAL OFFICE OF CULTURAL GOODS ('Office Central des Biens Culturels') presented his unit tasked to centralize all information both from national and international sources related to this crime area, operate the image database TREIMA and which also included an operational group. He presented a huge scale investigation involving receivers in Belgium and the Netherlands who had organized numerous thefts from castles and private residences in France. Since the dismantlement of this criminal group, these thefts had decreased by 50%. He cited several cases where criminals with close relations to gang-type thefts and drug trafficking, but with a lack of knowledge of the art market, were detected when trying to sell high value paintings. He also described the case of a thief who, acting alone, had committed 172 thefts from museums, castles, and art galleries in France and neighbouring countries. He stated that different legislation on receiving stolen property, in particular with regard to bona fide acquisition, but also of the code of criminal procedure, presented considerable obstacles during the investigations.

  12. The REPRESENTATIVE OF EUROPOL reported that from January 2002, the mandate of his organization had been extended and crimes against property were now also one of the priority areas. The first steps to initiate concrete action were going to be prepared soon.

  13. The CANADIAN DELEGATE focused on the problems of providing training in his country due to the long distances involved. He stressed that it was imperative for police organizations to use the most advanced technologies to enable more policemen to take advantage of proper training. He then demonstrated a new method of training developed in his country with the use of the Intranet. The courses were entirely based on an internal electronic system and the trainees had remote access from their own office at a convenient time.

  14. For the REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT, this was a good example of an innovative practice which contributed to reduce the main obstacles often encountered: the costs for travel and accommodation and the absence from the working environment for a certain period.

  15. The ROMANIAN DELEGATE stated that his country had experienced a tremendous boom in thefts, plundering, illegal excavations and illicit trafficking of cultural goods between 1990 and 1995. However, from 1996 onwards, theft figures had dropped considerably, with the adoption of new laws and regulations, giving more responsibility for the protection to the actual owners, along with new structures within the Ministry of Culture, decentralization of activities related to the prevention, creation of specialist mobile police units in risk areas, and availability of resources to modernize the protection in museums.

  16. The DELEGATE OF UNESCO advised that the UNIDROIT convention in its Article 3 Paragraph 2 offered efficient assistance to recover archaeological items and invited all countries to join that convention.

  17. The DELEGATE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM representing Interpol London stated that there was no national unit in her country in charge of fighting art theft, and so far, no police database was available at national level. THE UNITED KINGDOM had acceded to the 1970 UNESCO convention and a new law was under preparation sanctioning those who deal in, import or are in possession of defined cultural objects knowing or believing that they have been stolen or illegally excavated from any monument or wreck in violation of the local law.

  18. The UNITED KINGDOM DELEGATE from the Art and Antique Squad at the Metropolitan Police reported that various links had been detected between illicit art trafficking, money laundering, organized crime and terrorism. Almost all thefts in the London area have been committed from private residences with a decrease in the number during the last few years. There was, however, clear evidence of increasing illegal exportation of cultural goods from Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan, mainly by air freight, to the London art market. In the last 18 months, approximately 800 objects have been seized, including an Assyrian marble relief valued at 5 million £ Sterling. He stated that the illegal entry was facilitated by a lack of well-trained customs officers.

  19. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CUSTOMS DEPARTMENT OF THE SCHIPOL AIRPORT mentioned a joint initiative of the Dutch Ministries of Culture and Finance resulting in a videotape containing instructions for the customs how to deal with cultural goods entering or leaving the Dutch territory.

  20. The SPANISH DELEGATE reported a major art theft committed from a private residence in Madrid in August 2001 which was solved due to an excellent international co-operation with the Swiss, United Kingdom, Colombian and United States police forces resulting in the recovery of all the stolen objects. He further indicated an increase of sales of cultural property on the Internet. He stated that police investigations were affected by the limited information published about the items and the confidentiality ensured by the legislation. He also noticed that online platforms have been used to sell fakes and underscored the need for the police to develop appropriate countermeasures.

  21. The SWEDISH DELEGATE presented some case studies including the robbery of three master paintings from the National Museum in Stockholm in December 2000. Three armed offenders executed the robbery, others set two cars on fire in two near-by street crossings to impede rapid access to the museum by the police, and escaped from the scene of crime in a small speedboat. The case turned in a typical art-napping. Whereas the robbery was executed professionally, the planning and the aftermath were rather amateurish. One painting was finally recovered in a drug case in 2001. Eleven perpetrators were convicted. The sentences ranged from 2 to 8 years' imprisonment.

  22. The SLOVENIAN DELEGATE described the preventive measures adopted in her country including the registration of historical monuments and movable cultural goods kept there. An increase of art thefts has been recognized and recently, several good quality fakes have appeared on the Slovenian market. Repeatedly, Slovenian police detected works of art originating from offences committed during the armed conflicts on ex-Yugoslav territory.

  23. The CROATIAN REPRESENTATIVE from the Ministry of Culture stated that since 1995, the number of art-related crime has continuously decreased in her country with, in the same period, an increasing clearing rate of up to 50%. This success can be put down to the reinforced collaboration between the police authorities and the Ministry of Culture, improved prevention, joint training, adoption of new legislation, increased international co-operation and the setting up of a specialized cultural property database with some assistance provided by the General Secretariat.

  24. The SPANISH DELEGATE representing the Guardia Civil reported on a successful international co-operation with the Italian Carabinieri and French police. The investigations lasted over two years and included numerous transborder surveillance measures. A total of 27 thefts were finally solved, about 100 works of art identified, 8 offenders arrested and approximately 20 suspects accused.

  25. The SWISS DELEGATE stated that the number of art thefts committed in Switzerland has remained nearly unchanged for several years. He presented important case studies with international ramifications including a theft of five master paintings from a Zurich based gallery in 1997 with three of them recovered in Belgrade last year and the theft of numerous historical watches from a clockwork museum in Geneva in 2001. He further informed that Switzerland, as one of the major market countries, had initiated political debates with a view to joining the 1970 UNESCO convention.

  26. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INTERPOL SUB-REGIONAL BUREAU OF ABIDJAN described the problems related to the illicit traffic in cultural goods, in particular from West African countries, illustrated by several cases. Lack of reliable inventories with photographic documentation, deficient protection, sometimes unclear ownership, missing or inappropriate legislation, and deficits in co-operation on both national and international levels often constituted basic obstacles for restitution. His office has undertaken a survey including the countries of the region and focusing on the actual crime situation, the availability of statistics, the legislation in force. He finally underlined the urgent need of adequate training.

  27. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INTERPOL SUB-REGIONAL BUREAU OF BUENOS AIRES mentioned the lack of inventories, in particular from churches, and the absence of specialized police units to deal with art crimes as the main factors impeding a more efficient co-operation. He underscored the need for appropriate training of all entities concerned including the police, customs and museums staff, for developing effective strategies, and highlighted the benefits from recent seminars with the participation of UNESCO, ICOM and Interpol. He announced a forthcoming training course scheduled to be held in Bogota, Colombia in November 2002.

 

5. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

  1. The UNESCO DELEGATE presented two important legal instruments: the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export, and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property and the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on the Return of Stolen and Illegally Exported Cultural Objects. Recently, important market countries such as United Kingdom and Japan joined the UNESCO convention and brought the number of signatory states to 95.

  2. The UNIDROIT convention offers new legal provisions for illegally exported objects and grants the possibility for individuals to bring claims before a foreign court. He clarified that the UNIDROIT convention only governed the physical return of the objects, but not the question of ownership.

  3. Mr JOUANNY confirmed Interpol's position considering both conventions as complementary tools. The General Secretariat has been involved in their drafting and invites all member countries to be party to both conventions in order to prevent illicit trafficking and to facilitate the return of cultural property.

  4. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION underlined the importance of the prevention of organized crime. He announced the 2nd workshop for the prevention of illicit trafficking in cultural goods scheduled to take place in Brussels in December 2002. The focus will be the networking of existing databases of stolen cultural property and improved co-operation between police, customs, the Ministries of Culture, and the private sector.

  5. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE described the approach his institution has been pursuing since several years in promoting the dialogue between the various actors by organizing a series of meetings dedicated to specific sectors including the police. The action has considerably slowed down over the last two years because of budgetary restraints. He added that more attention needs to be attributed to the raising of awareness of the citizens on the protection of cultural property, on the related legislation and on the emerging threat of fakes.

  6. The REPRESENTATIVE OF ICOM (International Council of Museums) explained the action taken by her organization currently representing a total of 17,000 members worldwide. In 1998, ICOM established a code of ethics for museums professionals which has been amended recently. Another key issue is prevention. ICOM has provided assistance to set up inventories, organized different workshops in Africa and South America and initiated awareness campaigns. Their series of publications of looted objects has enabled identification and restitution of several objects from Angkor, Cambodia, from Africa, and Europe. The publication of the 'Red List' aims to protect certain categories of cultural goods generally prohibited for exportation.

 

6. PROTECTION OF ARCHAELOGICAL OBJECTS

  1. The UNESCO REPRESENTATIVE presented the Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage adopted in 2001. Its annex includes the operational rules with the main principles being the preservation of underwater cultural heritage at the places where they are and the clear prohibition of their commercial exploitation. Further details can be found on the UNESCO website.

  2. The second UNESCO REPRESENTATIVE explained that the Afghan government had given UNESCO the mandate to co-ordinate all cultural activities in that country. He cited several cases of losses of historically important numismatic treasures, but also the complete disappearance of an ivory collection from the Kabul museum. Traces of the loot have been found in Pakistan, some silver coins have been melted in the United States, and gold coins have been brought to Japan. A huge amount of precise information is available and worth being recorded in a database and also made accessible to the public.

  3. Mr JOUANNY informed that one week ago, Afghanistan had become a member of Interpol. As to a possible data entry of cultural property items stolen in Afghanistan, there are no legal obstacles, but entering several tens of thousands of objects into the Interpol database and onto its website would not be possible without funding.

  4. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE REGIONAL DIVISION OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS RHÔNE-ALPES (DRAC) within the French Ministry of Culture introduced the project of a code of ethics specifically related to archaeology which has been initiated by ICOM and which involves approximately 140 countries including France. Inter alia, it obliges the researchers to deliver a scientific publication on the excavations carried out within a certain timeframe, otherwise the state concerned would authorize another archaeologist to excavate.

  5. The ITALIAN DELEGATE reported that under Italian law, archaeological finds were state property and that consequently, the possession of these objects was illegal. The practical difficulties in applying legal sanctions lie, however, in providing evidence of the commission of the presumed crime. Italy therefore invests a lot of effort in preventive measures such as the inspection of the terrain including the use of helicopters for surveying land areas and of motor launches for coastal zones. They try to establish risk charts with digitized geographic maps for specific endangered zones in order to engage efficient action against tomb-robbers in a very early stage.

  6. The SWISS DELEGATE stated that, in spite of the position of his country as one of the major art markets, there was currently no legislation on a federal level governing import and export of cultural property. New legislation is, however, currently debated in connection with the ratification of the 1970 UNESCO Convention. He then provided details of a very successful international co-operation which already started in 1975 between the Archaeological Institute in Bern and museums in Malibu, United States and Copenhagen, Denmark. Following several years of collaboration, finally archaeological finds including fragments, statuettes and bronze bowls emanating from illegal digs in Southern Italy have been unified in an exhibition in Bern in 2000 and restituted to Italy against a long term loan of some of the pieces to the Swiss institute.

 

7. SALE OF CULTURAL PROPERTY THROUGH THE INTERNET

  1. The REPRESENTATIVE OF EBAY explained that his company was an international online trading platform for a variety of objects with currently approximately 46 million users worldwide. The company has set up a global trust and safety department headed by a former prosecutor and assisted by international investigation teams. He invited law enforcement officers to contact his company in the event of suspicious items proposed for sale in order to remove them from the site and to initiate further investigations.

  2. Mr JOUANNY, General Secretariat, confirmed this statement by a recent experience where eBay had immediately removed a suspect object from the website even though in the end, the object could not be identified as stolen.

 

8. NON-POLICE ORGANIZATIONS

  1. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ART LOSS REGISTER reported on the services available through his company. ALR runs a stolen art database currently holding information of about 130,000 items mainly supplied by the insurance companies. On a contractual basis with major auction houses, they search approximately 350,000 auction lots annually and regularly make matches that lead to recovery and restitution. They have also been engaged by organizers of international art fairs to check the objects. Searches on the Internet are now becoming major recovery areas.

  2. The REPRESENTATIVE OF INVALUABLE/TRACE stated that his company was operating an Internet accessible database with more than 100,000 items. By means of automatic screening, they check about 3.5 million lots a year from nearly 900 auction houses. They also run a historical database of previous auctions including the sales prices and a pre-sale database. The latter is an interesting tool to get information on illegally excavated archaeological objects prior to an auction sale.

  3. The REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MUSEUM SECURITY NETWORK described his initiative of creating, six years ago, an international platform with a view to collecting and disseminating information on incidents affecting cultural property including thefts, forgery, illicit excavation, looting during armed conflicts, security and prevention issues, and matters relating to legislation and law suits in this domain. He also introduced the Cultural Heritage Watch, an institution founded in 2000 by a Chinese lawyer, to prevent illegal excavations in that country. He finally presented the Leyden Network, a co-operation forum of scholars from 6 European countries and two international organizations, whose aim was to prevent the looting of the cultural heritage from several regions, promote the accession to the UNESCO and the UNIDROIT conventions, and develop ethical standards and practices in the art world

  4. The REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BELGIAN/LUXEMBURG UNION OF ART DEALERS (UBEMA) and the FRENCH ASSOCIATION OF ANTIQUE DEALERS AND ART GALLERIES both criticized the UNIDROIT convention which contained certain requirements to be accomplished by the art dealers prior to the purchase of cultural goods although the appropriate means enabling them to actually comply with these duties were not available. In particular, they mentioned the need for either a unique database containing all information on stolen cultural property or for an accessible network of existing databases.

  5. The UNESCO representative clarified that the consultation of registers of stolen art was only one of the elements that constituted the proof of due diligence and that the difficulties encountered were no excuse to neglect the other requirements, as well.

  6. The representative of ICOM reminded the art market of the possibility to create itself appropriate instruments to better help the dealers in this situation.

  7. Mr NOBLE, Secretary General of the ICPO-Interpol, addressed the participants in confirming Interpol's commitment to contribute to a safer world. He underscored that the Organization was currently investing considerable efforts in optimizing the telecommunication network within the Interpol community. He stressed the vital importance of international police co-operation in all crime areas as well as the benefits arising from the corporate relationship with other entities such as the UNESCO and ICOM. He finally encouraged the delegates to intensify their professional contacts with the effective use of the Interpol facilities.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS


  RECOMMENDATION (1)
  RECOMMENDATION (2)
  RECOMMENDATION (3)
  RECOMMENDATION (4)
  RECOMMENDATION (5)

 RECOMMENDATION (1)

The participants of the 5th International Symposium on Works of Art, Cultural Property and Antiques meeting in Lyon, France from 29 to 31 October 2002:

UNDERSTANDING the benefits from a close co-operation between governmental and non-governmental organizations at an international level,

ACKNOWLEDGING the value of such co-operation in fighting cultural property crimes,

AWARE of the apparent lack of co-operation at a national level between the relevant organizations,

RECOMMEND each member state to facilitate the creation of a forum to enhance the co-operation of appropriate parties within their own country.

 

 RECOMMENDATION (2)

RECOGNIZING the increase of cultural property items from illicit archaeological excavations, appearing on the international art market, with particular concern to cultural heritage originating from countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, and Egypt,

UNDERSTANDING the difficulties encountered by police and customs services in identifying the origin of these cultural goods,

AWARE of the need to consult experts to determine the origin of these objects,

KNOWING that appropriate expertise may only be available in the afore-mentioned countries,

RECOMMEND UNESCO to establish a list of experts for the different categories of cultural goods and also to make available the appropriate legislation pertaining to these countries of origin to all law enforcement officers.

 

 RECOMMENDATION (3)

CONSIDERING the need to distribute information on stolen cultural goods to the benefit of all people and organizations concerned,

AWARE of the existence of the tools developed by the General Secretariat of the ICPO-Interpol to allow for this exchange of information,

RECOMMEND the member countries to communicate more information on stolen cultural goods to the General Secretariat and to make a maximum use of the communications tools put at their disposal, in particular the ASF database and the CD-ROM 'Interpol - Stolen Works of Art'.

 

 RECOMMENDATION (4)

TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION the importance of the fight against the theft of and the illicit trafficking in cultural goods,

RECALLING that in its resolution AGN/64/RES/6 adopted in 1995, the General Assembly of the ICPO-Interpol had reiterated the main elements of the 1970 UNESCO convention and the 1995 UNIDROIT convention in order to propose the member countries of the Organization to implement the principles arising from these texts,

RECOMMEND the Interpol member countries to solicit their competent authorities to be party to these conventions, if this has not yet been the case.

 

 RECOMMENDATION (5)

IN VIEW of the need for the countries to set up inventories of their public and private collections,

NOTING the importance to disseminate as rapidly and widely as possible the information on stolen cultural goods,

RECOMMEND the countries:

  • to enhance awareness of the owners, holders, and possessors of cultural goods of the possibility to use the description standard OBJECT ID in order to establish their inventories, when they do not exist;

  • to use the standard OBJECT ID to disseminate the information on stolen cultural goods.

 

Last modified on 13 Jun 2006 
  © Copyright INTERPOL 2009. All rights reserved.        Home | Search | Contact | Help