INTERPOL international conference on stolen Iraqi art
5 May 2003, Lyon, France
Printable version
by Mr Mounir Bouchenaki,
Assistant Director-General for Culture, UNESCO
Mr Chairman,
Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentleman,
It is a great honour for me to represent here the Director General of UNESCO,
he asked me to convey to this meeting his greetings and his hope that we will
really push you, the work that has been started since the disastrous looting
of the Iraqi National Museum, and other museums as well. First of all I would
like to thank Mr Deridder, the Executive Director of INTERPOL for inviting UNESCO
to participate in this meeting and I would like to thank also his two colleagues
who are very well known to UNESCO, Mr Kind and Mr Jouanny, because we are working
with them since many years in the framework of the convention of 1970, and for
example this handbook on the implementation of the 1970 convention was done
in very close relation with INTERPOL. I would like also to remind the participants
who are not familiar with the relationship between UNESCO and INTERPOL, that
there is an agreement between these two institutions particularly on the subject
that we are going to discuss today.
May I just quickly remind the story. I mean how this question of cultural heritage
of Iraq was tackled by UNESCO since the beginning of the war in Iraq. First
of all UNESCO used the experience of what has happened after the first Gulf
War and the looting that happened in the regional museums in the North and in
the South of Iraq. And we felt that this is a situation that may happen in Iraq
also during this time, and therefore we already wrote to INTERPOL to ICOM, to
the International Association of Art Dealers, explaining that there may be some
chaotic situation which will allow for looting like it happened during the last
war. And unfortunately, I mean we were not looking very much toward the future,
but we were sure that in a situation of war there is always this kind of situation.
And that's why when we saw on the television screens and through the news agencies
that the looting started, first of all in some ministries and some public institutions,
we were really afraid of what would happen to the Iraqi National Museum and
we have seen as all of you, how this museum was looted. This was really considered
as a catastrophe by all institutions and all museums in the world, and in UNESCO
we received a large number of appeals saying UNESCO should do something about
this looting. And therefore the Director-General Mr Matsuura decided to convene
a meeting on the 17 April. You remember that the looting was happening on the
7 and 8 of April. So at just a very short notice we invited the most prominent
scholars of the world who have worked in Iraq, who have experience in archaeology,
mainly the chief of archaeological missions and some leading experts like the
Director of the British Museum and the Director of the German Museum, to gather
in Paris at UNESCO Headquarters on the 17 April and to have a kind of first
assessment of the situation. We also invited some Iraqi scholars, very well
known Iraqi scholars, from New York University, Columbia University, London
University but also we tried, but we didn't succeed, to invite Professor Donigeorge
who is the Iraqi Director of Archaeological research in the Department of Antiquities
of Iraq. Our colleagues of the British Museum were more successful, ten days
later, to bring Professor Donigeorge to London. This first meeting on the 17
April and this gathering was aimed at first make a first assessment through
the knowledge received by the scholars, by their contacts with their partners
in Iraq, by the main researchers and the aim was first to have this assessment
and to make some kind of co-ordination of scientific networks for the cultural
heritage of Iraq. The second aim was to formulate some strategic recommendations
on this date in the era of the post-conflict situation in the view of rehabilitating
the cultural heritage of Iraq. Third, to establish the first plan of action
determining the immediate action, the medium term and the long term, for the
cultural heritage of Iraq. So this was the first action taken and immediately
during this period we were in contact with the State Department, Mr Matsuura
wrote to Mr Colin Powell and we were pleased to receive in Paris on exactly
the same date Mrs Bonnie Gardiner who I see here and I would like to really
congratulate her because she came immediately and we had very useful meetings
on that day, on the 16 and 17 April. This meeting was able to give a clearer
idea of what has happened and the main issue was the looting, and the main issue
was how to take immediate measures to stop the objects getting out of Iraq.
So my first action was of course to contact INTERPOL and I spoke to Mr Jouanny
and we wrote a letter to your office and we also wrote a letter to all the surrounding
countries, to the Minister of Culture because these are my partners, to the
Ministers of Culture of the surrounding countries asking them to reinforce,
through the Ministry of Interior, the search by the police and the customs at
the borders. In addition of course we contacted again ICOM, the General Secretary
of ICOM, Mr Brinkman, and also the International Association of Art Dealers,
and we thought that there should be immediately some kind of preparation of
a database. If we have knowledge about the objects missing, in order to stop,
eventually, their arrival into the market. This was really the first action,
the first immediate action taken on the 17 April after this meeting. Then we
continued to be in contact with several institutions and in particular with
the British Museum. In relation with Mr Neil MacGregor, the Director of the
British Museum, we thought that another meeting should be useful, directed particularly
toward the directors of museums. What we did in Paris was more a meeting open
to all specialities - antiquities, Islamic period, archaeology, museology -
all aspects were covered by this first meeting.
The meeting of London, organized by Neil MacGregor in co-operation with UNESCO
on the 29 April, that means last week, was directed mainly towards the leading
museums in the world, the major museums having collections of Iraqi cultural
heritage. And there also I was of course present at this meeting, representing
the Director-General of UNESCO, I made a statement on behalf of the Director-General
of UNESCO, the statement of the Director-General of UNESCO was mainly a statement
about the objects stolen and how to tackle this very important question of the
objects stolen. The main characteristics of the meeting of London at the British
Museum, was the fact that we had, for the first time since the end of the war,
we had two presentations by colleagues who have been to Baghdad just a few days
before the meeting. One from Professor Donigeorge, who explained to us, he is
Iraqi, he was in the Museum, he was following all this period of uncertainty
and also the unfortunate period of looting. So this was the first presentation
at the British Museum, and the second one was the presentation by Mr John Curtis,
the Curator of the Near Eastern Department, of the British Museum. This is the
plus, if we compare it with the meeting of Paris. So the meeting of London was
a meeting where we had finally more information and more technical details than
what we had, all of us, through the media, through the television channels,
who were reporting very well, like CNN, like BBC, the RAI. I mean, I saw personally
these three channels and there were quite a lot of information you can take
from the image which were shown on the screen. The two exposés by Professor
Donigeorge and by John Curtis were concentrating of course on what has happened
in the museum of Baghdad. Until now we don't have these technical data, informations
about Mosul, in the museum of Mosul, or in other museums. And also, I am personally
an archaeologist by training so I am very much concerned by what would have
happened also in the archaeological sites. You know we have got some experience
in UNESCO with the Afghan cultural heritage, and we have seen that even a long
time after the end of the Taliban's regime, the looting and the illicit excavations
continued in Afghanistan. And we have reports, particularly one report made
by one of our Italian colleagues when he visited the minaret of Jaan after inscription
of this minaret on the World Heritage List, we received a report showing that
the whole hill behind the minaret of Jaan was like a, in French we say un gruyère,
you know like this cheese with holes, and this was the result of illicit excavation
going on at a very large scale. So our other concern is that, of course we should
concentrate, and we are going to concentrate on what has happened in the Iraqi
Museum in Baghdad, in the Mosul Museum, but also we should be also careful about
what is probably happening in the archaeological sites of Iraq like Hatra, like
Ur, Assur, etc.
Coming back to this meeting of London, I would like say that this first part
of the meeting was very useful because we had presentation of exactly what kind
of looters were going into this museum. You have seen probably all the various
reports and it seems that there are two kinds of looters. There are the looters
that we can consider people going in the streets, seeing no authority, and saying
"it's good if we can take something" like they did in some Ministries,
taking a chair or lamp or a computer. And this is probably one aspect of the
looting. The other aspect, and now it's quite sure, is done by people who knew
what they were taking because Mr Donigeorge reported to us that there were some
casts of the Stella of hamorabae casts of objects in the gallery of the museum.
These casts were not taken. Were taken only objects, precious objects, and we
have pictures of, for example, the Vase of Uruk. And we are all afraid because
this is a fragile object, but it is a very original and very precious object.
Then we had a very interesting discussion between the various directors of museums
and experts in the field of museums and also in the presence of ICOM, in the
presence of the representative of the Art Loss Register, and some members of
the parliament present in this meeting. We all considered that it was absolutely
useful now to start establishing a database. This is now becoming very important
and the good news in this bad news is that the inventory of this museum was
not burnt. It was confirmed by Mr Donigeorge, we were all afraid what happened
to the inventory. Has the inventory disappeared? Has the inventory been, you
know, scattered around, like we saw in the pictures, you know, all these fiches
around on the floor. No. The inventory is there. Of course, the method now is
to see through the various publications, scientific publications, of the archaeological
missions, through the data which are still preserved in the museum, what is
left and what is missing. So for example, our two colleagues who were in Baghdad,
were not able to tell us what about the situation of the objects in the stores.
They didn't have access because of electricity cut, they didn't have access
into the store. Another very important question which was raised in Paris by
some experts was about treasures which were put in the vaults of the Central
Bank. What happens to these objects, we are not sure about the situation of
these objects. Everybody knows that the Central Bank was attacked, that looters
took money, but were they able to go into the vaults, were they able to take
out from the vaults the collections that were put, since the first Gulf War,
they were put in the safe at that time. So these are the informations that we
were able to receive and to take into account and I think it is very important
that the establishment of a database is really now constituting an important
step.
The third phase in this very short time was the meeting I had in Paris with
Mr Jouanny from INTERPOL, during which we discussed how to tackle this question
of the database, and in which way we can really be efficient in working with
the various institutions and bringing the information to INTERPOL. Here I want
to tell you that I discussed with the Ambassador of Switzerland to UNESCO, Mr
Feldmeyer, and he immediately reacted to my proposal that this is a very urgent
matter: establishing the inventory, putting in place a database, organizing
the relations with all the institutions which have the inventories, which have
files, and trying to co-ordinate with INTERPOL, the transmission of the information.
I am pleased to inform you that the Swiss Government has already allocated 250,000
Swiss francs for this particular operation. So this is, I think, a very good
support that we were expecting if we have to go ahead. And in fact we have to
go ahead, because one of the recommendations of the meeting in London was to
ask UNESCO to co-ordinate between all the institutions the work of establishing
a proper database. So these are the various stages of what we have been able
to prepare since the beginning of the war in Iraq. Let me turn Mr President,
to French, of you'll allow me,
Je voudrais, Monsieur le Président, dire que cette réunion nous
la considérons, à l'UNESCO, comme fondamentale parce qu'elle va
permettre de définir maintenant de façon encore plus pratique
quelles sont les actions que nos deux institutions en relation avec toutes les
institutions qui sont spécialisées, qui sont nos partenaires habituels
dans le domaine de la lutte contre le trafic illicite des uvres d'art
comment nous allons mettre en place maintenant le système d'inventaire
et le moyen de récupérer les objets. Une des actions au plan politique
que le Directeur général de l'UNESCO a lancé déjà,
depuis quelques jours c'est de demander à Monsieur KOFI ANAN, le Secrétaire
Général des Nations Unies, d'inscrire un point à l'ordre
du jour du Conseil de sécurité de façon à ce qu'une
résolution soit prise au niveau international par tous les Etats pour
bloquer, pour empêcher l'importation d'objets en provenance d'Iraq. Vous
savez tous que la Convention de 1970 est ratifiée par 97 Etats partie.
Alors bien sûr, et c'était l'une des discussions que nous avons
eu avec Madame Bonnie Magness-Gardiner il y a quelques jours les Etats-Unis
sont parties de la Convention de 1970, la Grande-Bretagne est Etat partie de
la Convention de 1970, la France est Etat partie de la Convention de 1970, mais
il y a beaucoup de pays qui ne sont pas Etat partie de la Convention de 1970
et c'est la raison pour laquelle nous avons pensé que même si c'est
pour une période temporaire, une décision qui est prise à
l'échelon de tous les Etats, même ceux qui ne sont pas signataires
de la Convention de 1970, permettrait de lutter plus efficacement contre l'importation
d'objets en provenance d'Iraq. Donc ça c'est sur le plan politique.
Sur le plan technique maintenant, nous avons proposé aux autorités
américaines et aux autorités anglaises, de constituer très
rapidement une mission pluridisciplinaire qui puisse se rendre en Iraq et qui
puisse faire un premier inventaire, un premier état des lieux pour le
musée bien sûr de Bagdad, mais aussi pour d'autres sites de façon
à pouvoir préparer un plan d'action pour la réhabilitation
du patrimoine iraquien. J'ai eu la chance d'en parler directement le 29 avril
avec le Professeur Denis GEORGES qui a accueilli cette idée avec beaucoup
d'enthousiasme qu'il a dit pendant sa conférence de presse et là
nous sommes en train de discuter les derniers aspects logistiques qui nous permettraient
de nous rendre en Iraq, le Directeur général m'a chargé
d'ailleurs de conduire cette mission pluridisciplinaire qui comprendra des archéologues,
des architectes, des muséologues, de façon à couvrir tous
les champs concernant le patrimoine Iraquien. Aujourd'hui, notre réunion
devrait donc se concentrer sur ce que nous savons, c'est-à-dire sur les
informations reçues à ce jour concernant le musée de Bagdad,
concernant le musée de Mosul mais nous n'avons pas plus de détails.
Cette réunion devrait nous permettre de renforcer la coopération
internationale, je vois ici beaucoup de personnes que je connais, avec lesquelles
nous avons déjà travaillé. Donc premièrement renforcer
la coopération internationale et la coopération avec la police.
Si la presse est déjà la presse en a parler, j'ai été
interviewé hier soir par la BBC, ce matin j'ai écouté une
radio parisienne qui parlait de cette réunion, si la presse sait qu'il
y a un effort qui se fait à l'échelon international, je pense
que c'est déjà une première étape qui va freiner
les trafiquants qui seront que malgré tous il y a maintenant une action
qui est prise à l'échelon international et qu'il y a une coopération
entre les différentes institutions. Deuxièmement, il faut pour
pouvoir certifier que les objets sont volés, s'assurer qu'ils sont effectivement
venus des dépôts et des galeries du musée, alors nous avons
été assurés jusqu'à maintenant par Monsieur Denis
GEORGES que tous les objets avaient un numéro d'inventaire et qu'ils
étaient enregistrés dans leur catalogue général
du musée. Nous avons même eu des personnes privées en France
qui nous ont écrit en disant : " Nous avons acheté un catalogue
du musée de Bagdad, nous le mettons à votre disposition ".
C'est une action qui montre que toute la sensibilisation que nous avons faite
depuis quelques semaines est en train de porter ses fruits et il y a vraiment
des volontés même de personnes privées pour essayer de lutter
contre ce vol d'objets. Nous devons donc assurer maintenant que les données
soient rassemblées, collectées, selon un format qui doit être
élaboré ici, puisqu'il doit être compatible et capable d'être
passé avec facilité à la base de données d'INTERPOL.
Pour cela nous pensons que le système d'INTERPOL qui existe déjà,
qui est fait sur la base du idea object, nous devons le maintenir et nous devrons
travailler dans le cadre de ce système. Mais il faut aussi se poser la
question ici et voir de quelles manières protéger l'information,
car il ne s'agit pas de mettre cette information sur le site et la distribuer
sans une surveillance et une manière de contrôler ces informations
et savoir vers quels destinataires elles vont être envoyées. Enfin,
assurer le suivi de cette opération, ça veux dire organiser de
temps à autre des rencontres qui nous permettrons de savoir où
est-ce qu'on en est et qu'elles sont les résultats déjà
obtenus. Je dois dire que selon deux ambassadeurs que j'ai rencontrés
la semaine dernière à Paris, l'ambassadrice de Jordanie auprès
de l'UNESCO et l'ambassadeur de Turquie auprès de l'UNESCO. L'ambassadrice
de Jordanie m'a dit que des instructions très fermes avaient été
données à la police aux frontières en Jordanie et que déjà
certains objets ont été récupérés. Donc cela
veut dire que quelque part le système commence à fonctionner et
que la police jordanienne est en train de faire un travail de recherche dans
les bagages qui sortent de l'Iraq. Pour la Turquie, j'ai obtenu l'assurance,
il y a trois jours de l'ambassadeur de Turquie qui m'a rapporté une réponse
du ministre de la Culture à qui j'avais écrit le 17 avril, me
disant que des instructions avaient été données effectivement
aux postes frontières avec l'Iraq en Turquie et que des recherches allaient
être suivies et entreprises. Donc il va falloir assurer un suivi de toutes
ces opérations et voir quels sont les résultats que nous allons
obtenir de cette manière. J'ai pu voir comme vous tous que les autorités
américaines avaient saisi aussi aux frontières à l'arrivée
à Washington et à Boston, bon il ne s'agissait pas d'objets archéologiques,
il s'agissait de peintures d'objets contemporains qui avaient été
pris dans les palais de Sadam HUSSEIN mais c'est déjà aussi un
exemple de résultat qui montre que les instructions ont été
données aux polices et aux services des douanes pour empêcher l'importation
de ces objets d'arts. Voilà Monsieur le Président ce que je voulais
dire en guise d'introduction à votre séminaire, je crois que ce
séminaire s'inscrit dans la vision que l'ensemble de la communauté
internationale a actuellement pris en compte ; dans le train une de mes collègues
archéologues qui est italienne et qui a travaillé en Iraq m'a
remis cette revue qui s'appelle " Archéo Iraq " (texte arabe
: la civilisation qui part en morceau) et je voudrais vous lire juste un paragraphe
qui montre bien l'importance et l'intérêt de ce travail que nous
tous nous devons faire : je le lis rapidement en Italien :
La guerre qui vient de se terminer, a eu des effets désastreux pour
le patrimoine archéologique de ce pays et aussi pour un des musées
les plus importants du monde aujourd'hui endommagé pour les sites archéologiques
connus et les sites non connus. A tout cela s'ajoutent les milliers d'uvres
qui ont été volées et qui sont destinées au marché
clandestin international. Il est vrai aujourd'hui nous sommes tous plus pauvres
parce que nous avons été privés de notre histoire et de
notre mémoire.
Merci Monsieur le Président.
|
see
also
|